Bitcoin’s August Short Squeeze Reset Leverage Temporarily
Bitcoin’s record August short squeeze cleared $2B in bearish positions, but K33 data shows perpetual leverage has since rebuilt.

Bitcoin’s record August short squeeze produced one of the sharpest leverage resets of the current cycle, but derivatives positioning has since rebuilt. According to K33 Research’s “Altitude sickness can wait” report, Bitcoin gained 23% in one week as forced deleveraging helped break months of weak momentum and compressed trading activity. The move also pushed the cryptocurrency rapidly back above several major long-term moving averages.
The largest forced unwind occurred on August 19, when K33 data showed approximately $1.37 billion in Bitcoin shorts liquidated, nearly twice the previous daily record of $757 million from July 2021. Another $739 million in shorts were liquidated on August 21. The squeeze drove perpetual futures open interest down to 284,000 BTC, its lowest level since May, while funding rates returned toward neutral.
Crowded Shorts Turned Into Forced Buyers
The setup had been developing for months. Bitcoin derivatives had previously shown persistent bearish positioning, including a period when Binance funding turned negative while Hyperliquid displayed a pricing gap. Negative funding indicates that shorts are paying longs, but it does not independently establish how large those short positions are. Combined with elevated open interest, however, sustained negative funding can create conditions where a rapid price increase forces leveraged bearish traders to close positions simultaneously.
That feedback loop became visible in August. Closing a short position requires buying back the underlying exposure, so rising prices triggered liquidations that generated additional forced purchases. Spot and perpetual volumes increased 188% during the rally, while CME volume rose 152%, according to K33. The resulting move was therefore partly driven by mechanical deleveraging rather than discretionary buyers alone.
The reset also coincided with stronger demand through regulated investment products. Bitcoin ETPs attracted a net 31,740 BTC during the week, their strongest inflow since October 2025. That followed a broader period in which Bitcoin ETFs later accumulated $3.1 billion across a nine-session inflow streak. ETF creations and short liquidations both supported market demand, but they represent different flows and should not be combined into a single measure of institutional buying.
Leverage Has Since Returned
The August cleanup did not permanently remove derivatives risk. By November 2, K33 reported that perpetual leverage was climbing again even as CME open interest had fallen to a three-year low. The firm also described spot liquidity as unusually thin ahead of the U.S. midterms. That combination means the August leverage reset should be understood as a market event rather than a lasting return to balanced positioning.
The distribution of leverage has also evolved. Recent market data showed crypto leverage shifting increasingly toward altcoins, while Bitcoin open interest declined during part of October. Lower Bitcoin leverage therefore does not necessarily imply lower systemic derivatives risk if leveraged exposure is accumulating in markets with thinner liquidity.
The late-October Binance breach added another volatility shock, but it should be separated from the August squeeze. K33 reported that Bitcoin fell only 3.4% during the turbulent week surrounding the hack and the Federal Reserve decision, while Bitcoin ETPs recorded substantial withdrawals. More recently, ETF redemptions have again tested Bitcoin demand. Neither development changes what the August episode demonstrated: crowded leverage can disappear rapidly, then rebuild as market positioning changes.
The August squeeze remains significant because it showed how quickly bearish derivatives exposure can become compulsory buying when liquidity is thin. What has changed since then is not the mechanics of that risk, but the positioning behind it, with K33 now again identifying elevated perpetual leverage as a source of potential volatility.
This article is for information only and is not investment advice. We report under our Editorial Policy; to flag an error, see our Corrections Policy.


